On The Value of a Picture

Okay. So you may recall that I mentioned (briefly, hyper-cautiously) that I had a new Thing going on. You may also recall me saying that I wasn’t ready to say much about it. (You know, right before I said things about it.) And, here I am again today: still not ready, still saying more things. Um, so it goes.

But bear with me. You may also recall that I mentioned spending time with this Person (sorry, can’t resist) in New York–a place, you likely remember, I don’t (currently) live.

In fact, neither does he. (Do you like these hints? I think we’ve narrowed it down to the world minus eight million people!) But, still: it remains the case that he and I don’t live within one, or even two thousand miles of one another.

Which is all to say: perhaps I would reveal more about what this Thing was if I, myself, knew. But, geography (and other, you know, Things) such as they are, I have no friggin clue. It’s possible that I will never see him again. It is also possible that, five years from now, we will wind up wedded and window shopping on weekend mornings in some precious East Coast enclave that features a lot of brick. (Discuss.)

An uncertainty that, as you might guess, I find not a little unsettling. But I’m adjusting. As you may, also, recall, I’ve got other things (namely: a dissertation; and: trying to sleep every once in a while) on which to focus my efforts and energies.

And, as A put it the other day, while I watched her scrub her bathtub and recounted the latest developments, at least I’ve got someone to think about.

“Exactly!” I told her, leaning my head against the tile. “Isn’t that kinda the only thing that matters!?”

Here’s the part where I share something else that’s personal, the part where my stomach churns and I momentarily question the whole dating-blog enterprise (really? I’m going to say what happened? And put it on Facebook?) and then continue on because, what the hell else am I gonna do? Attempt an ending for my dissertation? As we say in New Mexico (kind of), that’s what manana is for. Also, I’m abnormal and don’t really care.

So, here goes: over break, (before above mentioned Thing), I finally talked to M: finally, I asked him how he felt. I need only tell you that the conversation was unpleasant, and you can imagine the rest.

I don’t want to undermine the feelings I had for him or the weight of my expectations about our potential future. (Okay, I totally do. But if I did, and you never trusted me again, I wouldn’t blame you.)

But I do want to tell you this: that the day after we spoke, riding the Bolt Bus up from Washington to New York, I contemplated what seemed the most devastating impact of the conversation: who, I wondered, was I going to think about now?

It’s a question with which I anticipated grappling. The night before I talked to M, I stayed over at my friend R’s house in Mt. Pleasant.

“Are you sure you’re ready to do this?” she asked as we lazed around her living room drinking tea. “Like, don’t you need those fantasies of ending up with him sometimes? Like, when you’re jogging and it’s hard?”

“Totally,” I replied–but, as I told her, I was determined to do it anyway.

A moment later, she took back her counsel: “Nevermind,” she said. “The great thing about fantasies is that you control them. Who cares what he says.”

It’s true: I could picture myself married to Brad Pitt if I want to. Pretty sure Angelina (if, you know, she happened to hear) wouldn’t consider me too big a threat.

But, sadly, I don’t. I want to have a different face to stick in those domestic daydreams of dinner-making and basketball-watching: one that the entire world and I don’t collectively encounter every time we go to Walgreens.

Because it isn’t, of course, just about the face: it’s about the comfort of having a concrete possibility. However remote it may be: I know there’s just as good a chance of me ending up with this guy (you know, the “Thing” guy) as there is for me to be with a whole handful of people I’ve never laid eyes on.

But I can’t picture them. I can picture him. And on days when I’m jogging, or lunging, or writing, for that matter, and it’s hard–that’s an option I’m pretty glad to have.

 

 

Some Notes on (Alleged) Neediness

“I have a feeling I’m going to read that online in the near future,” my mother said, giggling and smugly sipping her espresso at the Scandinavian-styled Park Slope coffee shop where we were taking a pause from our holiday mother-daughter shopping spree.

It’s not often that my mother offers sincere romantic advice–as I’ve written, between the two of us, I tend to be far more comfortable in that territory. (To her credit, not exactly a fair contest.)

But when she does, it’s reliably valuable. And, usually, pretty even: Take things slowly. Men freak out when you get emotional. Did she mention, I should slow down a little bit?

This time, though, her counsel was markedly flip: “He hasn’t texted back in two days!” I moaned to her, my lower lip in full pout.

Her reply: “Oh, come on. Don’t be so needy.”

“Who, me?” I scoffed. “Needy?” Okay I didn’t say that. But I wanted to. Instead, I raised my eyebrows and said, “It’s not that I’m needy. It’s just that I’m neurotic and anxious and paranoid. There’s a difference.” (Proof: “I haven’t texted again.”)

My mother shrugged. “Okay,” she said, and off we went: dodging strollers down 5th Avenue to the overpriced shoe store half a block away.

I had a similar exchange back in Albuquerque a few days later, as I vented to my friend A about the same thing. “Well have you been texting a lot?” she asked, turning her head and narrowing her eyes across the table. “I feel like you do that.”

“Why does everyone think I’m so needy?” I shot back. “I don’t text that much! I only talk about it!”

(A conversation reminiscent of another I had with my sister-in-law over break. Her: “Well, aren’t you obsessed with finding a boyfriend?” Me: “No! I just write about it!” My “persona” spiel, it would seem, only goes so far. But, I digress.)

Let’s set aside, for a moment, the question of how “needy” I actually am. On second thought, let’s not. Because yeah, I guess I do have some needs, and ya know what: I don’t think they’re unreasonable. (Particularly when I’m not, ahem, demanding they be met.)

Here’s what I need: I need to know what to expect from someone. That’s all. Should I expect that we’re going to be in close contact? Should I expect that we’re going to have dinner on Thursday night? Should I expect that we’re going to fall madly in love and buy a house in brownstone Brooklyn and stroll our child around on Sunday mornings, browsing expensive clogs?

I mean: is that so much to ask?

Well, according to every woman in my life–from my mother, on: yes. Apparently you can’t actually know what to expect from someone right away. Apparently you can’t even assume they know what to expect of themselves. Apparently, expecting to know expectations makes one needy.

And, heavens: we don’t want that.

So here’s the thing. I know I have to go with the flow–whatever the hell that means. I know that I should demonstrate faith in widespread wisdom about the male gender, such widespread wisdom indicating that men do not like being confronted with women’s needs, men finding it more attractive when women are independent and carefree and apparently unaffected by their behavior, however peculiar or confusing. I know that’s what I’m supposed to do. And, I am here to tell you, I’m pretty good at just doing it.

But good lord: sometimes I don’t want to. Sometimes, I don’t want to have to pretend that I’m indifferent, or not thinking about someone, or not wondering whether they’re thinking about me. Sometimes, it even feels dishonest: what’s the point in pursuing emotional intimacy with a person if you can’t even be open with them about how you feel?

Did I mention that I’m not very patient?

Unfortunately, I get that from my dad.

 

 

Letter to a Friend Who Can’t Get Close. Or, Get Over It.

So, one of my dear friends is going through a pretty rough transition right now.

Actually, she’s wildly happy, goes out all the time, and has more fun on a weekly basis than most people I know combined. Nonetheless, she lacks the requisite stability for a therapist and has things on her mind.

Namely: like a lot of women my age, part of her is thrilled to be single and loves her life that way, and another part–you know, the part that grows from some indecipherable combination of genuine longing, physical desire and immense societal pressure–really fucking wants a boyfriend.

A combination that found us absorbed in a morning-after-late-night-out (many boys met, little potential perceived) talk in which she determined to probe the psychoanalytical depths of her issues with intimacy. Why, she posed, was she so afraid of getting close to someone?

Donning my neutral, poker-faced therapist persona, I leaned back on her bed, took a sip of milky black tea, and asked what I imagined my therapist would: “What,” I asked, “is the worst thing that can happen?”

We mumbled through a collective response: pain, heartbreak, suffering, misery, disappointment, loss, devastation.

You know: a heartbreak.. A really, really shitty thing–but a finite thing all the same. Sure, there are some heartbreaks that last a while, but the acute trauma–the brutal, unbearable misery–doesn’t last.

So why is it that so many of us are so paralyzed by the fear of something that, rationally, we all know is temporary?

As someone who makes herself vulnerable with the determined regularity of Michelle Obama’s arm workouts–it would seem a hard question to answer.

So yeah: for mysterious reasons that I routinely, and with equal determination, continuously explore, I don’t let fear of that hurt prevent me from risking it. But that doesn’t mean I don’t know all about that fear.

Instead, I basically live with it constantly. I (shocker) think about it always. Every time I get attached to someone, I enter a constant condition of terror that they will break my heart. And then, usually, they do…and then I get over it…and  then I do it again: a pattern that does nothing to diminish the intensity of that fear each and every time.

Because, each and every time, the fear–like the attachment–is different: I’m not (yet) pinning myself to the nearest eligible man-without-a-substance-problem. I get attached to men I find genuinely interesting and exciting, people I love being with and talking to, people I can (you know, almost immediately) imagine a real and happy future with.

And each of them transform that abstract, existential fear of hurt into something concrete and singularly, specifically scary: not just that I will spend a few weeks wimpering couchside but that I will lose this person–this particularly, singularly fabulous person whose affections (and, perhaps most importantly, whose elaborately imagined future with) I’ve grown dependent upon, will take it all away.

Because at any moment, without any warning, they can. A truth that I’m pretty sure will never cease to be terrifying.

But then, so are a lot of things we can’t control: anthrax attacks, sick children, car accidents, plane crashes. And we still all go around living our lives, riding subways and planes, having kids and periodically going on dates, because that’s why we’re here: to see the world, to be passionate, to make families, to fall in love.

What else is there to do?

Pause: So I wrote all that a few days ago, and then WordPress got cranky, and I got lazy and self-doubting, and am only going back to post now. And since writing it I’ve spent time with a friend who has gone through just about more shit in her young life than most people can fathom ever getting through. And you know what? She’s getting through it. Not only that, she’s getting through it while having tremendous success and while surrounding herself with an exceptional amount of devoted friendship and love. And it’s easy to look at her life and think: “Gosh, I could never could deal with that.” And frankly, probably, most of us might not handle it as well. But the point is that if we had to, we would: that all of us are much more resilient than we think, that we handle the shit that we have to handle, and the most evidently stable parts of our lives can dissolve in an unexpected instant.

Which is all to rattle off this list of platitudes (thank you for indulging me): you never know what will happen, and chances are, somehow, you’re gonna get hurt, no matter what. If you’re happy being single, that’s great. Believe it or not, I am, too. But if you’re holding back out of fear, then listen to what I should have told my friend a week ago: whatever happens, you can deal. Get over it.

On Letting Your Silly Out

So as you may have gathered from my last post, I have a potential, possible, very new, fresh, fragile, name-your-qualifier non-committed-but-obviously-I’m-excited-and-therefore-terrified Thing going on. (Or maybe you didn’t gather; as one friend curtly commented to me in response to that post: “Very vague.”)

I’m keeping it that way. But, baby steps, there is one (more) thing I want to share.

This: on New Years Eve, he and I took the subway from Brooklyn to Manhattan wearing matching sunglasses. Why’d we do that? No good reason. Cause we wanted to, and, mostly, cause it made us laugh.

A couple days later, I took an afternoon walk with my brother J and sister-in-law D around Prospect Park. “We wrote a song this morning!” they announced, going onto sing, on 15th Street, in two-person round, made-up lyrics about vegetables (“Winter cabbage, winter cabbage…Only in the winter! Only in the winter!”), to the tune of Frere Jacques.

Before I could even register–much less vocalize–shock at my normally sober-faced brother’s suddenly brazen childish side (did I mention he’s in he’s late thirties?) they burst into another original tune: “This one’s about how Kanye West stole our dreams,” D proclaimed. “We’re going to send it to him!”

By that point, I’d resolved to restrain myself from making one of the roughly eighteen snarky comments that had sprung instantly to mind. After all, I’d just had occasion to sympathize: to remember that, sometimes, the best part of being with someone is letting–in full, childlike force–your silly out.

I know: you’ve patiently read along as I’ve preached, in post after post, that the more I date, the less I know about what I require in a partner; the more people I’m with, I’ve taken to crowing, the more I realize there are all sorts of ways to find happiness with someone: type, shmype.

I’m still standing on that soapbox. Mostly. Maybe I’m slumping a little bit, though (sorry, awkward metaphor) with the realization of how awesome–and, perhaps, essential–is is to be with a guy who brings out my inner goofball.

You see, I have one: an inner goof. But she doesn’t come out all that much. Sure, I joke around; I make variously successful efforts to pepper my conversations with intelligent wit. But it’s not often that I spend an afternoon giggling until my stomach hurts. Or dance around a living room to James Brown before breakfast. Or, you know, wear sunglasses on the subway.

“Why is it so important to be silly with someone?” I asked my best friend friend R over afternoon beers. (In case you missed it, winter break = lots of afternoon drinking. God bless grad school.)

“So funny you bring that up,” she replied, going on to tell me how her serious, live-in boyfriend had recently addressed that very thing: telling how much he valued how he could be more silly and playful with her than just about anyone else in his life.

“But why?” I asked again.

“I’m not sure,” she replied. “I guess we all need to lighten up?”

I think there’s truth in that: there’s a lot of serious shit in the world. And even, in a relationship: we have frequent occasion to be contemplative and thoughtful. We don’t always remember to acknowledge, outside of The Daily Show and Seth Rogen comedies, the necessity of cracking up.

The next day, over a pie of DiFara’s pizza (truly–in case you were waiting for me to weigh in–the best in New York), I asked her boyfriend what he thought. And his answer resonated even more: as he put it, when you can be silly with someone, it shows how comfortable you are with them. How much you can let your guard down. How little you care if they see you look ridiculous. In a way: how much you can be yourself.

I like that. There’s an essential vulnerability in being silly: just the act of laughing (and, especially, giggling), signals a loss of control–your body pulses, your muscles contract, you can’t stop or manage the movements. And there’s something really special about being able to do that, being able (and happy!) to relinquish the control we all cling to–in our lives, with others–in the company of the person with whom we’re intimate.

Did I just squeeze every ounce of funny out of the subject matter of humor? Yep, pretty sure I did. I guess that’s my cue.

And: scene. Happy silliness.

 

Yay 2012: The Paradox of Options

The other night I lamented to my friend D, over beers and corn dogs at a Brooklyn bar, the fact that I ever sincerely believed I might wind up marrying one of my exes.

“How could I have talked myself into that?” I exclaimed, dodging bocce balls.

“I wouldn’t worry about it too much,” he replied. “I mean, that’s basically your starting point.”

I laughed, cause it’s funny, cause it’s true. And it was especially funny, and especially true, because of what had happened just the day before: when I had an extended, if joking, conversation about marriage with a man who I had met–through a friend, in my defense–hours earlier.

You can imagine the dialogue: “You’re twenty-eight? I’m twenty-eight! Let’s get married!”, followed by a discussion of variously significant details: how many kids would you like? City or country? Wedding or elope? Etc. What, this doesn’t sound familiar?

Fascinating. Well, it does to me. It’s only happened a couple of times, but both with men I’d met just that day, and neither of whom I ever saw again–much less met at the alter.

But it won’t surprise you to know that, both times, too, there was part of me that could totally imagine getting hitched to the guy. (You know the perfect stranger to whom I’d just been introduced.)

Because: once you’ve established banter and attraction and mutual interest in a shared third party, what else, really, is there?

I mean, besides whether they want kids and where they’d like to live–both issues, by the way, I’m pretty sure remain unresolved in many a long-term couple–what else do you have to know?

In other words: if you really want to, you can make it work with just about anyone. (Really, I think, anyone. But, preferably: anyone you wouldn’t mind having regular sex with and talking to for a few consecutive hours.) I believe that. Being with anyone is gonna be work; it’s just a matter of whether you’re both willing.

And yet, I also believe–or rather, have, rather arduously, not to mention conspicuously, learned–that it can be hard to find a person with whom you share that kind of chemistry, basic as it seems, and have it all work out. (The more I think about it, the more “all” is just code for “timing.” Which means that I’ve been blogging about relationships for two years and have nothing more to show for it than an ancient cliche. Glad we had this talk.)

Moving on. Because what I really want to say is this: and yet. And yet: in spite of how many possibilities there, rationally, ought to be, there often seem so few. And not in a negative, god-I-just-can’t-meeet-anyone-screw-you-perpetually-crappy-timing sort of way; I mean the other side of it: the wow-this-person-is-so-amazing-how-can-I-ever-let-them-go thing. You know that thing?

Pretty sure we can relate on this one: it’s called infatuation, and few things are more fun. I mean, what tops that rush of opening yourself up and getting to know someone new and feeling like your connection is so rare that it’s worth whatever it takes?

So here’s the truth: I’m pretty happy right now, and it’s a lot harder to make sense of feeling good than it is of feeling bad. Also, generally, more boring. But it’s 2012 and I haven’t blogged in a while and I wanted to share that quote from my friend D at the beginning and I’m not really ready to write about anything else that’s going on.

But I did want to say this, cause I think it’s interesting, and maybe you do, too: when it comes to romantic partners, there are endless options out there. And yet: sometimes, there’s nothing better than feeling–in spite of yourself–that there’s only one you want.

 

 

A Theory, A Huff Post Blog, and A Healing (Healed!) Heart

Recently, I gloated to a friend that it had been almost two years since I started blogging (it will be in February, what’s a couple of months between friends?)–and that, so far as I know, it has yet to destroy any relationships!

The next day, a guy I’d been on two dates with decided, despite my good-natured, perhaps too subtle guidance against it, to read my entire blog: a decision that led him him to send me an approximately 500 word, largely indecipherable text message.

I like to think that the above anecdote illustrates not that I was wrong, but rather, that my my latest self-serving theory is, in fact, correct. And, of course, self-serving. What is this theory, you ask? Fine, I’ll share.

My theory is this: as far as the impact on relationships goes, writing this blog is basically equivalent to living with someone. It’s not going to change the outcome of things, but it will hurry along whatever destiny is ultimately in store. You know, co-habitation and blogging: catalyzing outcomes since the early 2000s.

And really, doesn’t everyone advise moving in together after the second date?

Moving on.

So, perhaps my blog has had more of an impact on my relationships than I like to admit. Whoops.

With this (kind of) in mind, I decided that–instead of blogging about why my heart currently aches (only hint: entirely unrelated to any and all epic texts)–I would write a light-hearted Huffington Post piece that makes excuses for why I don’t have a boyfriend.

I told my friend R about this choice over dinner tonight, sitting on barstools with eight-dollar pints and a mysteriously British bartender before us.

“But you don’t need to make excuses for being single!” she pleaded.

“I know,” I assured her. “But it’s funny.”

Well, it may or may not be funny. But it made me feel better. What heartache, you ask? I’d tell you, but I’ve already forgotten.

Anyhow. Happy second-night-of-Hanukkah. Happy almost two-years-of-blog. And happy, almost, 2012.

The Perks and Perils of “Mantourage”

My new friend/kickass yoga teacher C has brought many joyful things into my life this past year: moral support while shoe shopping (it gives me panic attacks, seriously), a cookie-baking companion, impressively toned quadriceps.

But perhaps the thing I cherish most about my new friendship with C is her vocabulary. She dispenses made-up words like bad doctors toss off obscure medical terms–you know, as though you ought to have heard them before.

So when I told her about the sudden burst of male attention I’ve been subject to lately, struggling to pull our sweaty clothes off in the bustling changing room, post-class, she didn’t miss a beat before pronouncing: “Sometimes mantourage happens!”

“What was that?” I asked, bending my head toward hers. “Did you just say ‘mantourage‘?”

“Yep,” she replied, “It’s one of my words.”

(Interlude here: Once, I was out at a rock show with a group of women. After we left, one of them regaled us with the story of her extended flirtation with the bass player. ” You know,” she said, dramatically flipping her hair as we walked down Central. “I was his first pick. I am always first pick.” I need hardly write that this comment caused all of us to vomit a little bit in our mouths. I do not mean to suggest that I am always first pick. I’m not. Or second, or tenth. I do not claim any more attention than anyone reading this. Only that, like many of us, when attention comes, it comes all at once–and when it doesn’t, um, it doesn’t. Moving on…)

I happen to know it was pure coincidence, but, after that “Man Up Or Shut Up” post I wrote recently, one of the guys I’d had in mind actually manned up and asked me out.

A few days later, out at a bar, another cute dude asked for my number. Then I got back in touch with a guy who was flaky when we met months ago, but who now seems eager to reconnect. Then another guy, one who I’ve had a flirtation with for approximately two years, finally asked whether I had a boyfriend and wanted to go out with him.

Have I mentioned that no one has looked at me since August?

It actually hadn’t occurred to me, either, until I started prepping myself for a night out. (You know: putting on pants that aren’t pajamas, shaving.)

“I just realized that I haven’t even kissed someone since August!” I told N, as I admitted to some measure of nerves.

“Really?” she replied.”It doesn’t seem like it!”

“I know,” I said. “It’s cause August was a very busy month.”

It’s true: in August, everyone wanted to date me. Okay, not everyone. Really just two people, one of whom changed his mind by Labor Day. But still–for a minute there, it all seemed unreasonable.

And then fall happened. And yeah, I did do some hibernating. But not totally–what I call “hibernation” is some, less social person’s version of a normal, active social life. Early bedtimes notwithstanding (thank you, insomnia and early morning yoga shift), I’ve been out and about a decent amount.

And, for four months, I may as well have not had breasts. Besides some occasional, unproductive Facebook flirtatiousness–a pastime that most guys I know have fessed up to habitually indulging, since that HuffPo piece–each time that someone asked what was up with my love life, I cheerfully replied: “Absolutely nothing!”

Besides the hibernation factor, there was also the whole mentality thing: I really did talk myself (and, perhaps, you) into “not wanting anything” for a while. But come on, we all knew that was bullshit. No one wants attention from the opposite sex because it’s practical–we want it because it feels good. Because we all need regular reminders that we are sexual creatures. And that we can, sometimes, connect in that way.

So, had some handsome fella come my way at some point in September, or October, or November, I doubt I would have turned him away.

But he didn’t. I saw some handsome fellas during that time. They’re around. But they didn’t seem to see me. (Or, perhaps, they did—but didn’t do anything about it. The nerve.)

Until, suddenly, a few did. Which brings us back to “mantourage.” As C says, sometimes it does happen. Begging the question: why? I don’t look any different this week than I did three or six or ten weeks ago. I’m pretty sure my scent and wardrobe haven’t changed. So why, now, do I seem suddenly more attractive to the opposite sex?

Perhaps it’s similar to the boyfriend factor: aka how, when you have a boyfriend, you seem more desirable. You’re more confident, you’re not looking, you give off some mysterious “you can’t have me, therefore you want me” odor. Guys flirt with you more.

Sad as it seems, just a hint of male attention can lead to a major confidence boost. So maybe that’s what causes “mantourage” to take place: one spurt of interest leads to another. And then another. And then another. Until you’ve got enough suitors to form a minyan–except that none of them know any Hebrew because, as we all know, Jewish men prefer Catholics.

Which, I must say, I find very inconvenient. I’ve tried dating multiple people at once. It doesn’t work. I have trouble concentrating when I’m dating one person; when there’s more than one to think about, I may as well be my 101 year old grandmother with all six of her grandchildren simultaneously traveling on airplanes. I’m a wreck.

So the fun part, for me, isn’t about actually doing much to take advantage. And nor, as we’ve seen, is it very much fun to contemplate why. But I won’t complain: turns out it’s pretty nice to just sit back and feel flattered.

Sometimes mantourage does just happen. And, apparently, you’ve just got to let it.

What Not to Get Me for Christmas

Two things I’m pretty sure I’ve made clear before: one, I bake a lot. Two, I have very awesome, very generous parents.

Said two things collided when I went home for Thanksgiving: creating a scenario in which I stood in my parents’ kitchen, helping my mother chop carrots, as they announced that they had an idea for a Christmas present they’d like to get me. (So yeah: we’re Jewish, but we celebrate Christmas. Or rather we used to, before all my brothers got married and my parents were less interested in taking late December vacations. But those are two different essays).

Anyhow. Quite pleased with themselves, they announced their bright idea to buy me a Kitchen Aid.

I know: when someone offers, enthusiastically, to buy you a very expensive gift that is also extremely thoughtful, not to mention utilitarian, you’re supposed to respond with equally enthusiastic gratitude. But normal social conventions don’t apply with parents–at least in my world, no matter (or perhaps because of) how awesome and generous they are.

So instead of reacting with, “Oh my gosh, thank you!” I barely looked up from the wood countertop as I exclaimed, “No! Not yet!

As I proceeded to tell them, I have long associated getting a Kitchen Aid with getting married.

Part of this is practical: the things are damn heavy. I can’t count how many apartments/houses I’ve lived in since college, and I don’t know how many more there are in store. It’s enough to schlep around the piles of sweaters and scarves that I’ve  managed to accumulate, along with the Cuisinart I bought myself years ago and the approximately six hundred books that I don’t even want to discuss. Anyhow: a Kitchen Aid seems like the kind of thing you don’t get until you have a real home: not just a place where you live, for now.

“That is so sweet of you to offer,” I, finally, mustered the decency to tell my parents. “But I don’t think I want to have one yet.” (As I assured them, I actually kind of like mashing butter with a fork. I also get sincere pleasure from mincing garlic and lemon zest. Gotta get it where you can.)

A couple of weeks later I was at a downtown Albuquerque coffee shop with A when, staring off from her laptop, she asked whether I ever thought about buying a house.

I had the exact same response: “No!” I said. “Not yet! Not until I’m married!

We both laughed as I told her about the parallel conversation I’d had with my parents. “I guess those are the two things,” I told her. “A house and a Kitchen Aid.”

Let’s be real: there are lots of reasons why I don’t, at this moment, consider buying a house. Mostly, this: that the money I have saved up could barely send a ten year old to summer camp. For four weeks. Much less purchase a 1-2 bedroom. Also, I don’t even know where I want to live.

But it’s true: the thought of buying real estate while I’m single does seem kinda radical to me. Perhaps I’ll wind up changing my tune, but for now, I’d like to find a partner before I find property.

And on both counts, this attitude seems a bit outdated: It’s the 2000s! I’m an independent, strong-willed woman on her way to a terminal graduate degree! I consider myself progressive! Borderline alternative! I do yoga and (as of this week) drink kombucha, for Christ’s sake! Shouldn’t I be enlightened enough to not think I need a man to make large investments–of real estate, and, particularly, of sturdy kitchen appliances?

My friend C, also a compulsive baker, has a similar mindset about the Kitchen Aid. She’s always expected that the man she’s supposed to marry, you know, the proverbial “right guy,” will buy her one.

I admire C’s hope–and have every confidence she’ll find her man, and her mixer. But for me, it’s different. As we’ve discussed, too many years of manic dating have dissolved just about every fantasy I once held about my future partner: from the color of his hair to what kind of books he’ll read. Certainly, I don’t have any expectations about what he’ll get me for a holiday gift.

In my case, it isn’t about the idea of a man, or even of marriage, so much as the idea of settling down. Which, of course, is also code for “growing up.” A Kitchen Aid—and a house–is stuck in my head as something one has when one has achieved that “adult” status. When one has officially crossed over from kid/adolescent/emerging adult to, you know, a real live grown up person.

A transition that, by now, I recognize as perpetually elusive: I’m pretty sure my kid-raising peers feel much the same unsettled angst that I do. Intellectually, I know that nothing, not even those cliched markers of adulthood—getting married, buying a house, having babies—will necessarily, truly signal that I’ve “grown up.”

But a Kitchen Aid? Perhaps.

 

 

 

It’s Official…

…I’ve finally been called a lesbian manhater! I’m not sure what that signals, but frankly, I’m shocked it’s taken this long.

Thank you, Huffington Post! If you haven’t checked out my latest blog over there, on why men should stop flirting with me if they aren’t gonna ask me out (hence the lesbian manhating, duh), here ’tis.

And be sure to check out the comments sections. HuffPo commenters are a very special breed…

Happy Saturday, dears!